ฟอรัมเกี่ยวกับ proz.com » Poll Discussion »
Poll: In the near future, translators will no longer use CAT tools.
เธรดต่อผู้เขียนข้อความ: ProZ.com Staff
ProZ.com Staff
ProZ.com Staff
พนักงานของเว็บไซต์
Apr 3

This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "In the near future, translators will no longer use CAT tools.".

View the poll results »
 
Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida
Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida  Identity Verified
โปรตุเกส
Local time: 23:36
สมาชิก (2007)
ภาษาอังกฤษ เป็น ภาษาโปรตุเกส
+ ...
I hope... Apr 3

I've never used them to begin with! I'm what is called a dinosaur in this business...

Dinosaur
 
Christine Andersen
Christine Andersen  Identity Verified
เดนมาร์ก
Local time: 00:36
สมาชิก (2003)
ภาษาแดนิช เป็น ภาษาอังกฤษ
+ ...
As long as humans are in control ... Apr 3

Where translation is surrendered to AI, there is no need for a CAT.

However, if humans are to stay in control, then a CAT is an excellent tool for keeping track of terminology and ensuring consistency. It can be linked up to AI, but the human translator can check, segment by segment, that the translation is correct, ensuring that hallucinations and inaccuracies are prevented. Where a previous translation is outdated, the human can override it and correct it (assuming the human is aw... See more
Where translation is surrendered to AI, there is no need for a CAT.

However, if humans are to stay in control, then a CAT is an excellent tool for keeping track of terminology and ensuring consistency. It can be linked up to AI, but the human translator can check, segment by segment, that the translation is correct, ensuring that hallucinations and inaccuracies are prevented. Where a previous translation is outdated, the human can override it and correct it (assuming the human is aware of the need, but that is part of the translator's job).

Wikipedia has found it necessary to ban AI-generated material.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/27/wikipedia-bans-ai

“Caution is required, because LLMs can go beyond what you ask of them and change the meaning of the text such that it is not supported by the sources cited.”

AI may be used for editing and for translation. (my emphasis)

Some of the machine translations I have seen have been of quite good quality, but not better than a well-trained human. A CAT can be a very useful tool for checking as well as for translating from scratch, and as long as accuracy and consistency are important, I expect CAT tools will be a part of the process. ▲ Collapse


Lieven Malaise
Martin Jonuschat
Géraldine Fourrier
Annamaria Amik
Marjolein Snippe
Edward Tully
Carmen Valentin-Rodriguez
 
Lieven Malaise
Lieven Malaise  Identity Verified
เบลเยียม
Local time: 00:36
สมาชิก (2020)
ภาษาฝรั่งเศส เป็น ภาษาดัช
+ ...
I don't think so Apr 3

I see no indications that this will happen anytime soon. CAT tools are still the best and most reliable way to make old translations easily accessible and useful.

Martin Jonuschat
Sebastian Witte
Christine Andersen
Matthias Brombach
expressisverbis
 


To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:

ผู้ไกล่เกลี่ยของฟอรัมนี้
Jared Tabor[Call to this topic]

You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »

Poll: In the near future, translators will no longer use CAT tools.






Draftsmith
Edit Translations Faster With Affordable AI You Can Trust

Draftsmith is an affordable AI editing tool for busy translators. It works directly in Microsoft Word, supporting the way you work ProZ members receive a 20% discount on a single user subscription of Draftsmith.

More info »
Wordfast Pro
Translation Memory Software for Any Platform

Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users! Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value

Buy now! »